Key Players: Decision Making in Terrorist Incidents

decisiveness making is defined as simply the act of choosing among available alternatives close to which uncertainty exists (Mingst, p. 457). However, decision making is not an easy process specially with the participiation of individuals within the politics. Individual elites or the key players decisions and actions greatly affect the personal line of credit of events as well as the accompaniment of the country when one of versatile factors are present and one of which is during time of crisis equal terrorist incidents (Mingst, p. 133).The decisions made by these elite individuals are influence by politics within the government which eventually affect their actions (Mingst p. 460). The effects of the choices that they make are not evermore advantageous as sometimes it have its unfortunate consequences in the situation of the ccountry. A good contendning to exemplified such idea is the aftermath of death chair George W. Bushs decision to attack Iraq. Three imporatnt areas were freehandedly affected by it, the countrys municipal cohesion, the international standing of the United States of the States and the insecurity felt by those immediately affected by the decision.The domestic cohesion of the United States of America has been greatly affected by Pres. Bushs decision . Many citizens especially the ones magnetic dip towards the democratic side did not agree with his reasons of doing such in the prepare of U.S. battle against the war on terror. Moreover, the domestic consensus became much harder to achieve with the add of personal gain.Opening Iraqs oil economy would greatly benefit the Bush family, creation a member of one of the largest American oil company the Washingtons Carlyle concourse (Chenoy, p. 23 ). A clear indication of which is the drop in the benediction evaluations of the president after his speech that ordered the deployment of more troops in Iraq. Sixty percent of those who were surveyed expressed their disapproval in Pres. Bushs performance (Iraq drives Bushs rating to new low, 2006).Another area that is adversely afftected is the international standing of the country. Many states as well as international organizations are not in elevate of the U.S. presidents course of action. This immediately put the country in a bad light especially its leader because the non-approval of these states emphasizes the illegitimacy of this action. A good example is the European Union (EU) that has been the countrys partner in economic activities but they didnt adjudge Bushs action against Iraq. EU believes that Americas unilateral strategy would not benefit their multi-polar pursuit (Chenoy, p. 25 ).Lastly, is the effects of this decision to the citizens of Iraq as well as to the U.S. soldiers. The war has left numerous casualties in terms of death tolls, damage to property, as well as the over all security of the country (Chenoy, p. 27). harmonize to the Iraq Body Count Project (IBC), there were 947 civilian death s reported in the midst of 1st and 27th of February this year (Enforced security solution or makeshift?).The weight of an elite individuals decisions and actions is greatly felt in crisis situation like terrorist incidents. The choices they make could have numerous effects in the country of their leadership and to others as well. Unfortunately, the politically driven decision of these key players could have adverse consequences in the lives of many people.Works CitedChenoy, Anuradha. Demystifying alarmism a War Against Terror & The Terror Of War, US Hegemony & Militarism. ARENA, 1997.Enforced security solution or stopgap?. 28 February 2008. Iraq Body Count. 12 May 2008..Iraq drives Bushs ratings to a new low. 14 March 2006. CNN. 12 May 2008. http//edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/13/bush.poll/.Mingst, Karen. Essentials of International Relations. Norton, 2001.