Marx and Carnegie Essay

For centuries, many philosophers lead discussed the issue of class struggle. Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both developed theories of the unequal distribution of wealth a long clipping ago however the only Carnegies ideology could apply to American caller today. In The Communist Manifesto, Marx first introduces the two briny social classes bourgeois (the upper class) and proletarians (the lower class or on the job(p) class). He points out the revolution of industrialism has made changes of Capitalism to Communism. He suggests that the loaded should redistribute office evenly beca handling the proletarians have put a circulate effort contributing in the revolution. In contrast, Carnegie analyzes in The Gospel of riches, the unequal distribution of wealth is a natural consequence of civilization. twain Marx and Carnegie present the problem within confederation because they want to contribute their induce experiences from various views to resolve the tension between the rich and poor high-octanely. By eliminating the gap between rich and poor, Marx believes Communism should replace the economic brass of Capitalism. In his perspective, he claims, They have nonhing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.Working men of all countries, unite (Marx 476). Because he sees the Capitalist system exploits fermenters who are unfairly do by, he asserts that the proletarians should become the popular opinion class. The principle of Communism is the ideology of collectivism. Marx states, Communism deprives no man of the antecedent to appropriate the products of society all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the proletariat of others by means of much(prenominal) appropriation (470). This means that no privy property should be allowed, and no one has even a slight or more power in a Communist society. Because Marx illustrates the property ownership would rear greed, and ambition to win in the competition notwithstanding of any consequences, he concludes the more competitions are eliminated, the better people would carry through into their work. The goal of it is to bring up aneconomic more and more efficient as well as its equality. Despite the fact both Marx and Carnegie reconcile that people who work hard deserve to live a in(predicate) life, Carnegie insists the great solution to the issue between rich and poor is search on the blotto class in society. He expresses, The outmatch minds allow for thus have reached a state in the development of the lead in which it is clearly thoughtful and earnest men into whose bands it flows save by using it year by year for the general good (495). instead of conforming to Marx ideology of letting the proletarians rule the society, Carnegie thought that the rich pull up stakes an important responsibilities which means to improve the better touchstone of living in society. Since the poor will al panaches be among us, he has mentioned the word best minds to identify the rich who represent the most better and successful gathering within the population. Carnegie offered the solution of having the wealthy provided institutions and education programs, so the poverty could check how to build their own wealth and have the great social benefits. In The Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie likewise mentions in the theory of Social Darwinism, society cant be better because the wealthy have such a great deal amount of coin, but they are not thinking carefully in what and how to spend their silver properly. He verbalise it is only useful when they find a good way to use that money to help the poors problems. He doesnt hold in everyone who give generously to charity because the poor are not educated enough to use the money wisely, perhaps spend it on vapid frivolities. He condemns, It were better for mankind that the millions of the rich were thrown into the sea than so spent as to encourage the slothful, the drunken, the unworthy (494). Thus, inst ead of spending money on useless things, he suggests that the rich should leave their wealth for humanity good. He used the Cooper Institute to expand his point that the overt had used this institution to have themselves better rather than using the money Cooper had donated to them. He illustrates, Of every thousand dollars spent in supposed charity to-day, it is probable that $950 is unwisely spent so spent, indeed, as to piddle the very evils which it proposes to mitigate or cure (494).In the Communism and Individualism, Marx and Carnegie stormily contrast against each others ideologies. In Marxs perspective, the wealthy doesnt seem to consider the effort of laborers so there is an inconsistency gap between two social classes. However, Carnegie strongly refuses Communism because hebelieves Communism only work on theory but not in reality. He asserts that through Communism, people expect to be treated the same, so it maybe lead them to do nothing better for their lives and soc iety. On the other hand, Carnegie explains the concept of Individualism can promote independence and enhance good communication between two separate social groups. He adds, Not evil, but good, has come to the race from the accumulation of wealth by those who have the ability and energy that produce it (488). It means people work hard individually can achieve good education and as well to have a better chance to develop their standardisedized lives. Nevertheless, Marx is also against Carnegies perspective. Marx proved that Communism promoted equality among individuals, creating a uncouth agreement in regards to moral standards. Moreover, all different classes have the rights to allot and sell any products of manufacture to create a best standard living.Even though, Marx and Carnegie both represent the unequal distribution of wealth in capitalist societies, they discuss the tension between two social classes in different perspectives. In Marxs ideology of Communism, he wants the p roletarians ruling society while Carnegie believes the bourgeois are qualified to improve the standard of living. Carnegie also mentions that the rich must spend their wealth in appropriate way such as contribute their money wisely to public uses. all(prenominal) of their ideologies propose the advantages and disadvantages in the Communism and Individualism however, the purpose of presenting the different perspectives of Marx and Carnegie is to cut down the gap between rich and poor as well as bringing the economic equally to develop a better standard life for all social classes.Works CitedCarnegie, Andrew. The Gospel of Wealth. A land of Ideas Essential Reading for College Writers. Ninth Ed. Eds. Lee A. Jacobus. Boston Bedford/ St. Martins, 2013. 485-495.Print.Marx, Karl. The Communist Manifesto. A World of Ideas Essential Reading for College Writers. Ninth Ed. Eds. Lee A. Jacobus. Boston Bedford/ St. Martins, 2013. 456-476. Print.